moreno1
December 20, 2023, 4:29pm
1
Hello,
I have a problem when I try to deploy my app:
FATAL: could not create lock file “/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432.lock”: No such file or directory
I did the upgrade to postgresql 16 and it works fine locally (windows + docker).
I am really a beginner and would need at least to be pointed in the right direction: what could be causing the error?
Thanks for any hint!
moreno1
December 21, 2023, 4:35pm
2
Ok, I’ve deleted the app and recreated it and now it deploy and run the migrations without any error… but after that something happens…
The log, which I don’t understand…
2023-12-21T16:28:56Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] ▲ Next.js 13.5.5
2023-12-21T16:28:56Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] - Local: http://localhost:8080
2023-12-21T16:28:56Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] ✓ Ready in 691ms
2023-12-21T16:33:54Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]2023-12-21 16:33:54.304 UTC [331] LOG: checkpoint starting: time
2023-12-21T16:35:19Z proxy[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]Downscaling app opentribe from 1 machines to 0 machines, stopping machine 17811e16fe5258 (region=otp, process group=app)
2023-12-21T16:35:19Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] INFO Sending signal SIGINT to main child process w/ PID 313
2023-12-21T16:35:24Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] INFO Sending signal SIGTERM to main child process w/ PID 313
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] INFO Main child exited with signal (with signal 'SIGTERM', core dumped? false)
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] INFO Starting clean up.
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] INFO Umounting /dev/vdb from /pg_data
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]2023-12-21 16:35:25.610 UTC [330] LOG: received smart shutdown request
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]2023-12-21 16:35:25.619 UTC [330] LOG: background worker "logical replication launcher" (PID 336) exited with exit code 1
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] WARN hallpass exited, pid: 314, status: signal: 15 (SIGTERM)
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]2023/12/21 16:35:25 listening on [fdaa:3:41ab:a7b:1ad:f091:f190:2]:22 (DNS: [fdaa::3]:53)
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]2023-12-21 16:35:25.649 UTC [331] LOG: checkpoint complete: wrote 1003 buffers (6.1%); 0 WAL file(s) added, 0 removed, 0 recycled; write=91.329 s, sync=0.015 s, total=91.349 s; sync files=347, longest=0.002 s, average=0.001 s; distance=4637 kB, estimate=4637 kB; lsn=0/1950930, redo lsn=0/19508F8
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]2023-12-21 16:35:25.649 UTC [331] LOG: shutting down
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]2023-12-21 16:35:25.650 UTC [331] LOG: checkpoint starting: shutdown immediate
2023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]2023-12-21 16:35:25.650 UTC [331] LOG: checkpoint complete: wrote 0 buffers (0.0%); 0 WAL file(s) added, 0 removed, 0 recycled; write=0.001 s, sync=0.001 s, total=0.002 s; sync files=0, longest=0.000 s, average=0.000 s; distance=0 kB, estimate=4173 kB; lsn=0/19509A8, redo lsn=0/19509A82023-12-21T16:35:25Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info]2023-12-21 16:35:25.656 UTC [330] LOG: database system is shut down
2023-12-21T16:35:26Z app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info][ 393.773730] reboot: Restarting system
Hi… The “downscaling” in this message is the normal auto-stop feature, which generally is beneficial:
https://fly.io/docs/apps/autostart-stop/
It avoids having an idling machine there consuming resources.
moreno1
December 22, 2023, 7:01am
4
Ok but it’s not normal in this case, the app never went online (this is right after the first deployment).
It is shutting down for some reason and I can’t understand why…
Edit: Ok tried right now and it is not shutting down
2023-12-22T07:01:57.258 app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] ▲ Next.js 13.5.5
2023-12-22T07:01:57.258 app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] - Local: http://localhost:8080
2023-12-22T07:01:57.258 app[17811e16fe5258] otp [info] ✓ Ready in 682ms
The status is deployed but the app is still not reachable.
It is possible that the link under Hostname is wrong somehow?!
It can be a little misleading in atypical cases: it will show a link there even if the app in question has no public IPs.
(I have two like that.)
What do you see in fly ips list
?
moreno1
December 22, 2023, 7:24am
6
mayailurus:
fly ips list
VERSION IP TYPE REGION CREATED AT
private_v6 fdaa:3:41ab:0:1::2 private global 15h10m ago
moreno1
December 22, 2023, 7:42am
7
I guess this also shows a problem… no public ip addresses?
$ fly doctor
Testing authentication token... PASSED
Testing flyctl agent... PASSED
Testing local Docker instance... Nope
Pinging WireGuard gateway (give us a sec)... PASSED
App specific checks for opentribe:
Checking that app has ip addresses allocated... PASSED
No public ipv4 or ipv6 ip addresses allocated to app opentribe
Build checks for opentribe:
Checking docker context size (this may take little bit)... PASSED (14 MB)
Checking for .dockerignore... PASSED
Right… The public ones are required for access via .fly.dev
.
Aside: it would probably also be wise to double-check the [[services]]
section of your fly.toml
.
1 Like
moreno1
December 22, 2023, 8:08am
9
This did the trick
fly ips allocate-v4 --shared
Even if it’s not clear to me why wasn’t automatically given a shared IPv4 address on the first deployment like documentation from your link explains.
To answer your question about my fly.toml
[http_service]
internal_port = 8080
force_https = true
auto_stop_machines = true
auto_start_machines = true
But I have another app with the same configuration and I have no problems from that one.
Thanks so much for the help!!
1 Like
system
Closed
December 29, 2023, 8:08am
10
This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.